Will AI Agents Make a Place if the Privacy Policy Does It Provide?

A new competition began in the field of artificial intelligence: the privacy battle. The CEO of OpenAI Sam Altman claimed that this year’s AI agent called Dots, promoted in the DevDay event, the company’s privacy policy **” will be determined. However, the words that Meta builds Muse “ privacy-oriented“ in the similar way are making question in the industry yet.

A variety of concerns arise around the Privacy Statements:

• OpenAI does not clear how the Muse platform will be safer, while clearly criticizing Muse’s user data is sufficiently protected.
• Meta offered Muse as a safer alternative compared to the previous CogClaw system, but the promises in this kind were made earlier.
• Two giant companies have privacy commitments under competitive printing, but still uncertain how these promises will work in practice.
• Users are forced to understand how to protect personal data with the increased complexity of AI agents.

The sector shows its history, there are often serious differences between privacy promises and real practice. Although OpenAI and Meta’s phrases are positive, these promises can not only go beyond marketing strategy without independent audit and transparent data management policies. Future months will test the real stability of these companies in privacy.